Session 9 is a psychological horror movie that stars the weird looking guy from CSI, David Caruso and a ragtag group of actors that are nearly forgettable. Aside from Peter Mullan. He rocks. This confusing feature was made in 2001 and, according to the director, made specifically to be shot in the Danvers State Hospital. He had written the movie with the hopes of being able to shoot there. Needless to say, most of this movie takes place in the Hospital itself.
The movie is about a group of Asbestos removers that take on the rough task of removing two weeks worth of Asbestos in one week. The lead character, Gordon, seems to be going through a really tough patch mentally and needs this job to work out. One thing leads to another and eventually the creepy nature of the Hospital shines though haunting the group and making waves.
Each member of the group seems to have their own thing going on. However, the subplots do nothing but confuse the already thin story-line. Hank, the kooky, rebellious, blue-collar type finds a load of silver coins and treasures hidden in a brick wall. Meanwhile, back home he is having a tough time with his girlfriend (who happens to be the ex-girlfriend of David Caruso). Mike, the nondescript brainy member of the group, finds a bunch of tapes of sessions with a former inmate named Mary Hobbes. Then there's Phil, David Caruso. He's a burn out and has recently lost his girlfriend to Hank. He has taken up to smoking pot. Like, lots of it.
The movie's really confusing. It's fun to watch and has it's really creepy moments but it tries to do much more than it actually can. Like I said above, the subplots are horrible. They are a weak attempt to make the story move forward and do little to help with understanding the main plot. Instead the subplots just stand in the way. The cinematography is jarring. It has that ultra-realistic, pan & scan type camera work that makes everything look so cheap. A quick Google search reveals that this movie uses a 24p HD digital camera that films at 24-frames per second. Riviting.
I recommend this movie to anyone that doesn't like the blood and guts type horror. This movie has a very tiny amount of brutality. Most of the actual murder takes place off camera. The twist-y plot is fun but becomes too entangled in it's own confusion. It's cloudy and muddy but is a decent watch if you don't have anything else.